ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC ROK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1024478Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Jun 2018 | Named in a filing | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Quarles & Brady | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Oct 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Paul T. SchultzFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Morton A. PierceDewey BallantineFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- PETER R. KOLYERChadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Paul T. Schultz | Mar 2008 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Morton A. PierceDewey Ballantine | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.94 | 0.40 | 0.34 |
| PETER R. KOLYERChadbourne & Parke | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.15 |