NET SERVICOS DE COMUNICACAO S A
CIK 1024446Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 742 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 742 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Mayer Brown | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Neil Q. WhoriskeyCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Paul M. RodelDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Daniel S. SternbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil Q. WhoriskeyCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Paul M. RodelDebevoise & Plimpton | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Daniel S. SternbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & Plimpton | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.55 |