PERNIX THERAPEUTICS HOLDINGS, INC. PTX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1024126Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- May 2017 to Mar 2019
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Ward and Smith, P.A.First linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Jones Walker | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Ward and Smith, P.A. | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.54 | 1.37 | 1.16 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Reed Smith | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steve AbramsHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Thomas S. LevatoGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
- JEFFREY R. HARDERWinstead PCFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Peter T. HealyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve AbramsHogan Lovells US LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Thomas S. LevatoGoodwin Procter | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| JEFFREY R. HARDERWinstead PC | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Peter T. HealyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 46 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.55 |