Crusader Energy Group Inc. KRU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1024109Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lewis and RocaFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- RANDALL W. HEINRICHFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- HASKELL SLAUGHTER & YOUNGFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis and Roca | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.33 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Haynes and Boone | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| RANDALL W. HEINRICH | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.74 | 1.42 | 1.59 |
| HASKELL SLAUGHTER & YOUNG | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 25 | 0.97 | 1.85 | 0.63 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- RODNEY L. MOOREVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Guy YoungHaynes and BooneFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Randall W. HeinrichFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODNEY L. MOOREVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Guy YoungHaynes and Boone | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Randall W. Heinrich | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.96 | 0.79 | 1.43 |