POWER EFFICIENCY CORP PEFF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1024075Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Becker & Poliakoff LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.95× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Becker & Poliakoff LLP | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 40 | 1.05 | 1.95 | 0.85 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| Reed Smith | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Adam MimelesEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 2.55×
- David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Craig H. NorvilleFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Gerard S. DiFioreReed SmithFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam MimelesEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.55 |
| David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.41 | 1.80 | 1.99 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Craig H. Norville | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.73 | 2.76 | 1.05 |
| Gerard S. DiFioreReed Smith | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 0.00 |