LARSCOM INC LARS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1024047Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jamie E. ChungCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Sharon R. FlanaganSidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- HOWARD S. ZEPRUNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- W. Leslie DuffyCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Susan Cooper PhilpotCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie E. ChungCooley LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Sharon R. FlanaganSidley Austin | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 23 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| HOWARD S. ZEPRUNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| W. Leslie DuffyCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Susan Cooper PhilpotCooley LLP | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 14 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.78 |