ISONICS CORP ISON (last ticker on record)
CIK 1023966Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lord Bissell & BrookFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Burns Figa & WillFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Arter & HaddenFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.99× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lord Bissell & Brook | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.24 | 1.04 | 0.41 |
| Burns Figa & Will | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.34 | 1.45 | 2.03 |
| Arter & Hadden | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 61 | 1.01 | 1.99 | 0.58 |
| Cooley LLP | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark P. TanouryCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- C. Kevin KelsoFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- David R. DeckerArter & HaddenFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark P. TanouryCooley LLP | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 1.20 |
| C. Kevin KelsoFenwick & West LLP | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.18 | 1.66 | 1.61 |
| David R. DeckerArter & Hadden | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 0.00 |