TESCO CORP TESO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1022705Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Bennett Jones | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian P. FenskeNorton RoseFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Ted GilmanAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Jeff C. DoddAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian P. FenskeNorton Rose | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Ted GilmanAndrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Jeff C. DoddAndrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 1.38 |