NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES INC NEOM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1022701Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Reitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLCFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Reitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLC | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 16 | 0.00 | 1.17 | 0.83 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John D. Owens IIIK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Christopher J. DeLiseK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Robert Steven BrownReitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLCFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John D. Owens IIIK&L Gates | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Christopher J. DeLiseK&L Gates | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.97 | 1.61 | 1.19 |
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| David Gonzalez | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |
| Robert Steven BrownReitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLC | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 19 | 0.51 | 1.52 | 0.50 |