INSEEGO CORP. INSG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1022652Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2021 to Jan 2024
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Jones DayFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Paul Hastings | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Jones Day | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Teri O'BrienPaul HastingsFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Donna M. PetkanicsWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- J. Scott HodgkinsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Dec 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| Teri O'BrienPaul Hastings | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Donna M. PetkanicsWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| J. Scott HodgkinsLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 2.13 |