EPLUS INC PLUS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1022408Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Hazel & Thomas, P.C.First linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Nixon Peabody | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Alston & Bird | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Hazel & Thomas, P.C. | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Abby E. BrownSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Lloyd H. SpencerNixon PeabodyFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Frank M. Conner IIICovington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jonathan H. TalcottNelson MullinsFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 3.30× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abby E. BrownSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Lloyd H. SpencerNixon Peabody | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.47 |
| Frank M. Conner IIICovington & Burling | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jonathan H. TalcottNelson Mullins | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.51 | 3.30 | 2.28 |