Hunter Ridge Holdings, Inc.
CIK 1022356Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Coudert BrothersFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Jackson Kelly PLLCFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jones DayFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLEFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| K&L Gates | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Coudert Brothers | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 45 | 1.66 | 1.06 | 1.29 |
| Jackson Kelly PLLC | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 40 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.96 |
| Jones Day | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLE | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 19 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- John B. TehanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Jeffrey W. AcreK&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Ronald D. WestK&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 2.44 |
| John B. TehanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 33 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Jeffrey W. AcreK&L Gates | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 20 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Ronald D. WestK&L Gates | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 4.39 |