UNIVEST FINANCIAL Corp UVSP (last ticker on record)
CIK 102212Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C.First linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.27×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luse Gorman, PC | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Stevens & Lee | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C. | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.27 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory M. SobczakLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Scott A. BrownLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
- Stephanie R. HagerStevens & LeeFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- David W. SwartzStevens & LeeFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Wesley R. KelsoStevens & LeeFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Scott BrownFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory M. SobczakLuse Gorman, PC | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Scott A. BrownLuse Gorman, PC | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 |
| Stephanie R. HagerStevens & Lee | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| David W. SwartzStevens & Lee | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Wesley R. KelsoStevens & Lee | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Scott Brown | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |