MIDWAY GAMES INC MWY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1022080Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Shack Siegel Katz Flaherty & GoodmanFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- SHACK & SIEGEL, P.C.First linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Jones DayFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Bullivant Houser Bailey PCFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Lord Bissell & BrookFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Robinson BrogFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Blank Rome | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Shack Siegel Katz Flaherty & Goodman | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| SHACK & SIEGEL, P.C. | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Jones Day | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Bullivant Houser Bailey PC | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Lord Bissell & Brook | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 42 | 1.24 | 1.04 | 0.41 |
| Robinson Brog | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 27 | 1.86 | 0.72 | 2.30 |
| Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLP | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 1.27 | 1.54 | 2.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elizabeth C. KitslaarJones DayFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Pamela E. FlahertyFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth C. KitslaarJones Day | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Pamela E. Flaherty | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.46 |