TOP IMAGE SYSTEMS LTD TISA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1021991Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schwell Wimpfheimer & Associates LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schwell Wimpfheimer & Associates LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Proskauer Rose | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dov T. SchwellSchwell Wimpfheimer & Associates LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- David GitlinWolfBlock LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Stephen W. RubinProskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 4.92× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dov T. SchwellSchwell Wimpfheimer & Associates LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| David GitlinWolfBlock LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Stephen W. RubinProskauer Rose | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.86 | 4.92 | 0.00 |