COMPUTERIZED THERMAL IMAGING INC CIO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1021853Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2003
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2000 to Sep 2007
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Axelrod, Smith & KirshbaumFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- LOOPER, REED, MARK & McGRAWFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.85× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 3.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Axelrod, Smith & Kirshbaum | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.89 | 1.50 | 0.69 |
| LOOPER, REED, MARK & McGRAW | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 5.85 | 1.33 | 3.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Joel SeidnerFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.03× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Owen NaccaratoNaccarato & AssociatesFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 2.15× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.56 | 1.77 | 1.05 |
| Joel Seidner | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 4.03 | 0.98 | 1.20 |
| Owen NaccaratoNaccarato & Associates | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.07 | 2.15 | 0.64 |