JCC HOLDING CO JAZA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1021352Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Oct 1999 to Nov 2000
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Adams and ReeseFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- McGlinchey StaffordFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Adams and Reese | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.78 | 0.43 | 1.55 |
| Alston & Bird | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| McGlinchey Stafford | May 2001 | Text search only | 15 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Derek D. DundasLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- Virginia BouletAdams and ReeseFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Laura G. ThatcherAlston & BirdFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek D. DundasLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.05 |
| Virginia BouletAdams and Reese | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| Laura G. ThatcherAlston & Bird | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.83 | 1.24 | 1.06 |