DXP ENTERPRISES INC DXPE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1020710Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Looper Reed & McGrawFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Looper Reed & McGraw | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Oct 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian P. FenskeNorton RoseFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Laura J. McMahonFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked May 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 4.01× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian P. FenskeNorton Rose | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Laura J. McMahonFulbright & Jaworski | May 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.65 | 4.01 | 0.00 |