GRANDPARENTS.COM, INC. GPCM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1020475Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| Proskauer Rose | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter D. VisalliDuane MorrisFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Neil S. BelloffProskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter D. VisalliDuane Morris | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.04 | 1.82 | 0.52 |
| Neil S. BelloffProskauer Rose | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 1.26 |