MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC. MWW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1020416Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Jones DayFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Dechert LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Jones Day | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2004 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Derek M. WinokurDechert LLPFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Derek WinokurMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Marc WeingartenSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Gerald AdlerDechert LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Martin NussbaumDechert LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert P. BellFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- MITCHELL S. PRESSERWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Gregg J. BermanFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- PAUL JACOBSFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek M. WinokurDechert LLP | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Derek WinokurMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Marc WeingartenSchulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.11 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| Gerald AdlerDechert LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.71 | 1.12 | 1.16 |
| Martin NussbaumDechert LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert P. Bell | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.13 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| MITCHELL S. PRESSERWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Gregg J. BermanFulbright & Jaworski | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| PAUL JACOBSFulbright & Jaworski | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 2.22 |