WALKING CO HOLDINGS, INC. WALK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1019439Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Dec 2008 to Dec 2009
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.26 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- KENDALL R. BISHOPO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLP | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin Procter | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| KENDALL R. BISHOPO Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 1.91 |