R2 TECHNOLOGY INC
CIK 1019274Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Silicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Husch Blackwell | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Silicon Valley Law Group | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 19 | 0.98 | 2.08 | 1.44 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- J. CASEY MCGLYNNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.20 | 1.24 | 1.03 |
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| J. CASEY MCGLYNNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 36 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 1.12 |