AMERISAFE INC AMSF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1018979Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Lord Bissell & BrookFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Walker | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Lord Bissell & Brook | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 1.24 | 1.04 | 0.41 |
| Jones Day | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexandra C. LayfieldJones WalkerFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kelly C. SimoneauxJones WalkerFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Justin S. ReinusWinston & StrawnFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- J. Brett PritchardLocke LordFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- JAMES E. O'BANNONJones DayFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra C. LayfieldJones Walker | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kelly C. SimoneauxJones Walker | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Justin S. ReinusWinston & Strawn | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| J. Brett PritchardLocke Lord | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| JAMES E. O'BANNONJones Day | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |