NATIONAL COMMERCE FINANCIAL CORP NCF (last ticker on record)
CIK 101844Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Muldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P.First linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLP | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 161 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P. | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.34 |
| Arnold & Porter | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| King & Spalding | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- National Commerce BancorporationFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- PHILIP A. THEODOREKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.06×
- Steven KaplanArnold & PorterFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Andrew M. TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- William V. FoggCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Commerce Bancorporation | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| PHILIP A. THEODOREKing & Spalding | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 3.06 |
| Steven KaplanArnold & Porter | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Andrew M. TuckerNelson Mullins | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 61 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| William V. FoggCravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 38 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.15 |