FIRST ACCEPTANCE CORP FAC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1017907Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bass, Berry & SimsFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bass, Berry & Sims | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.66 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | May 2009 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.85 |
| Covington & Burling | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald T. NowakKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- SANFORD E. PERLKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald T. NowakKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| SANFORD E. PERLKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.91 |