HIBBETT INC HIBB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1017480Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Williams MullenFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Balch & BinghamFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Jul 2024 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Williams Mullen | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 113 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Balch & Bingham | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.59 | 0.55 | 1.12 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul M. TigerFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven Della RoccaLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- GREGORY S. CURRANMaynard Cooper & GaleFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Alan DeanHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul M. TigerFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Jul 2024 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven Della RoccaLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.30 |
| GREGORY S. CURRANMaynard Cooper & Gale | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Alan DeanHogan & Hartson | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.94 |