NMT MEDICAL INC NMTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1017259Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2006 to Apr 2011
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Sheinfeld, LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 2.85×
- Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Sheinfeld, LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.67 | 1.94 | 2.85 |
| Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.27 | 1.54 | 2.17 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wendell C. TaylorWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- STEPHEN H. KAYSheinfeld, LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.86× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendell C. TaylorWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| STEPHEN H. KAYSheinfeld, LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.28 | 1.86 | 1.19 |