GRADALL INDUSTRIES INC GRDL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1017136Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proskauer Rose | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| King & Spalding | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Covington & Burling | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert A. CantoneProskauer RoseFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Allan G. SperlingCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- W. Andrew JackCovington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert A. CantoneProskauer Rose | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 51 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Allan G. SperlingCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| W. Andrew JackCovington & Burling | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 1.93 |