SRS LABS INC SRSL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1016470Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Paul Hastings | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Ellen S. BancroftDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- SCOTT SANTAGATARutan & TuckerFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 3.26× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- John F. Della GrottaPaul HastingsFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 2.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Ellen S. BancroftDorsey & Whitney LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.55 | 0.61 | 1.44 |
| SCOTT SANTAGATARutan & Tucker | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.13 | 3.26 | 1.29 |
| John F. Della GrottaPaul Hastings | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.47 | 1.93 | 2.99 |