PYR ENERGY CORP PYR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1016289Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Bearman Talesnick & ClowdusFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- HAND & HANDFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.31× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Patton Boggs | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Bearman Talesnick & Clowdus | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 0.93 |
| HAND & HAND | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 40 | 3.31 | 1.94 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- R. SCOTT COHENWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Lloyd H. SpencerNixon PeabodyFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Alan L. TalesnickPatton BoggsFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Francis B. BarronPatton BoggsFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- John C. ThompsonFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. SCOTT COHENWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Lloyd H. SpencerNixon Peabody | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.47 |
| Alan L. TalesnickPatton Boggs | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 1.28 |
| Francis B. BarronPatton Boggs | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.83 |
| John C. Thompson | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 13 | 1.09 | 1.92 | 2.05 |