MEDICONSULT COM INC MCNS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1016134Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 1999 to Mar 2001
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Richards & O'Neil, LLPFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Krys Boyle, P.C.First linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Richards & O'Neil, LLP | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.69 | 1.34 | 1.01 |
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| Krys Boyle, P.C. | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ann F. ChamberlainBingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Lawrence M. BellGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Jon D. SawyerKrys Boyle, P.C.First linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann F. ChamberlainBingham McCutchen | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 2.07 |
| Lawrence M. BellGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.47 | 1.57 | 1.79 |
| Jon D. SawyerKrys Boyle, P.C. | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.83 | 1.52 | 2.41 |