CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD CHKP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1015922Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Naschitz, Brandes, Amir & Co., AdvocatesFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Naschitz, Brandes, Amir & Co., Advocates | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2023 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.44 |
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.99 |