AMF BOWLING WORLDWIDE INC
CIK 1015535Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- LATHROP & GAGE LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| LATHROP & GAGE LLP | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 50 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.52 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Fried Frank | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald T. NowakKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Valerie Ford JacobFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald T. NowakKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Valerie Ford JacobFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 45 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.38 |