ASIA SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LTD
CIK 1015276Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Linklaters LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Herbert Smith | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark S. BergmanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- David M. WilfGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.27×
- Donald C. WalkovikSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Howard ChatzinoffWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark S. BergmanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.61 | 1.06 | 0.93 |
| David M. WilfGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.27 |
| Donald C. WalkovikSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 10 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Howard ChatzinoffWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 25 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 2.11 |