EXCELON CORP EXLN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1014955Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- O'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Bingham Dana | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Foley Hoag | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| O'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 35 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 1.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John D. HancockFoley HoagFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- John D. Patterson Jr.Foley HoagFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley HoagFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John D. HancockFoley Hoag | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| John D. Patterson Jr.Foley Hoag | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley Hoag | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.87 | 1.94 | 2.13 |