ZONES INC ZONS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1013786Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Lane Powell PCFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Graham & James LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Lane Powell PC | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Graham & James LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 1.46 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary J. KocherPreston Gates & EllisFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Michael E. MorganLane Powell PCFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- W. Michael HutchingsDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Frank C. WoodruffClifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- JOHN M. STEELDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary J. KocherPreston Gates & Ellis | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.28 | 1.24 | 1.66 |
| Michael E. MorganLane Powell PC | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| W. Michael HutchingsDLA Piper | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.59 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
| Frank C. WoodruffClifford Chance US LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| JOHN M. STEELDLA Piper | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |