EXDS INC EXDS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1013740Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2000 to Sep 2001
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & RobertsFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.18 | 0.53 | 1.62 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. SchultheisFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Andrew Y. LuhFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- DAVID HEALYFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Eileen Duffy RobinettFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.19×
- FRED M. GREGURASFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. SchultheisFenwick & West LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Andrew Y. LuhFenwick & West LLP | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| DAVID HEALYFenwick & West LLP | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Eileen Duffy RobinettFenwick & West LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 3.19 |
| FRED M. GREGURASFenwick & West LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
| Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 69 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.94 |