ARADIGM CORP ARDM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1013238Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2004 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| King & Spalding | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jon LaymanHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- Laura I. BushnellKing & SpaldingFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- John W. CampbellMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.53×
- Raymond T. HumMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Peter H. WernerCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.96×
- Jamie E. ChungCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- James C. KitchCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Seo SalimiGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- J. CASEY MCGLYNNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon LaymanHogan Lovells US LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.97 |
| Laura I. BushnellKing & Spalding | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| John W. CampbellMorrison & Foerster | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
| Raymond T. HumMorrison & Foerster | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLP | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 51 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 1.38 |
| Peter H. WernerCooley LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 2.96 |
| Jamie E. ChungCooley LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| James C. KitchCooley LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.73 | 1.10 | 1.70 |
| Seo SalimiGoodwin Procter | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 56 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| J. CASEY MCGLYNNWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 36 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 1.12 |