UNITED INDUSTRIAL CORP UIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 101271Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proskauer Rose | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- TED S. WAKSMANWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer Rose | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |
| TED S. WAKSMANWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.83 | 1.73 | 0.90 |