TIMCO AVIATION SERVICES INC TMAV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1012159Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Broad and CasselFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracewell LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Akerman LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Pryor Cashman | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Broad and Cassel | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 1.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael W. TankersleyAlston & BirdFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael W. TankersleyAlston & Bird | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.18 |
| Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.57 |