NOVT CORP NOVT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1012131Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan & Hartson | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph E. GilliganHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Joseph G. Connolly Jr.Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- SETH I. TRUWITEpstein Becker & GreenFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph E. GilliganHogan Lovells US LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Joseph G. Connolly Jr.Hogan & Hartson | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| SETH I. TRUWITEpstein Becker & Green | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |