ACTIVECORE TECHNOLOGIES INC TALL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1011601Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Burton, Bartlett & GlogovacFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Ruffa & Ruffa, P.C.First linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hodgson Russ | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Ruffa & Ruffa, P.C. | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ward B. HinkleHodgson RussFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Troy J. RilloK&L GatesFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.98× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- William P. RuffaRuffa & Ruffa, P.C.First linked May 2002 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward B. HinkleHodgson Russ | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Troy J. RilloK&L Gates | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.52 | 1.98 | 0.57 |
| David Gonzalez | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |
| William P. RuffaRuffa & Ruffa, P.C. | May 2002 | Text search only | 16 | 0.64 | 1.56 | 0.46 |