PRIMIX PMIX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1011255Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2000 to Dec 2001
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- H. DAVID HENKENFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.25×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Peabody & ArnoldFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| H. DAVID HENKEN | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 3.25 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Peabody & Arnold | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 3.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John B. SteeleGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John J. Egan IIIGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.03× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- William E. KellyNixon PeabodyFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.20× · Went dark 2.32× · 95% wipeout 3.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John B. SteeleGoodwin Procter | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John J. Egan IIIGoodwin Procter | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 1.59 |
| William E. KellyNixon Peabody | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 3.20 | 2.32 | 3.15 |