SIGA TECHNOLOGIES INC SIGA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1010086Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Nov 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Mar 2011 to Dec 2015
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Camhy Karlinsky & Stein LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Eilenberg & Krause LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- EILENBERG & ZIVIANFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 2.98× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Apr 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Akin Gump | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Camhy Karlinsky & Stein LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.74 | 1.34 | 2.40 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Eilenberg & Krause LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 35 | 2.12 | 1.61 | 1.83 |
| EILENBERG & ZIVIAN | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.12 | 2.98 | 1.81 |
| Jenner & Block | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Stevens & Lee | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter D. SeratingSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- LAWRENCE B. FISHEROrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 2.80×
- Adam D. EilenbergEilenberg & Krause LLPFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 5.87× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter D. SeratingSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
| LAWRENCE B. FISHEROrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.92 | 1.29 | 2.80 |
| Adam D. EilenbergEilenberg & Krause LLP | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.82 | 5.87 | 1.24 |