BONE CARE INTERNATIONAL INC BCII (last ticker on record)
CIK 1009405Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Michael Best & FriedrichFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Michael Best & Friedrich | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 65 | 1.51 | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Hodgson Russ | May 2004 | Text search only | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven SutherlandSidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Jim L. KaputSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven SutherlandSidley Austin | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Jim L. KaputSidley Austin | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.72 |