Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. ACOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1008848Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2015 to Apr 2024
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Covington & Burling | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Fried Frank | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric BlanchardCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Matthew C. FrankerCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Ellen B. CorenswetCovington & BurlingFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Fran StollerLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric BlanchardCooley LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Matthew C. FrankerCovington & Burling | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Ellen B. CorenswetCovington & Burling | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Fran StollerLoeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.35 | 1.13 | 0.95 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |