UNION ELECTRIC CO UEP (last ticker on record)
CIK 100826Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & RobertsFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Nov 2024 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Morgan Lewis | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.18 | 0.53 | 1.62 |
| Shaw Pittman | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael F. Fitzpatrick Jr.Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Nov 2024 | Text search only | 17 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |