ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP EDS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1007456Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jones DayFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Jones Day | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert L. KimballVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- JAMES E. O'BANNONJones DayFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew M. BakerBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert L. KimballVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| JAMES E. O'BANNONJones Day | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew M. BakerBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & Sterling | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 24 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |