PURE BIOSCIENCE, INC. PURE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1006028Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jun 2020 to Dec 2025
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Spectrum Law Group, LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gunderson Dettmer | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Spectrum Law Group, LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.97 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Akin Gump | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan J. GundersonGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Jeffrey C. ThackerDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Keith A. RosenbaumSpectrum Law Group, LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 3.33×
- Scott M. StantonMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Paul F. PereaBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.56×
- David L. EmmonsBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 2.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan J. GundersonGunderson Dettmer | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Jeffrey C. ThackerDLA Piper | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.35 | 1.17 | 0.88 |
| Keith A. RosenbaumSpectrum Law Group, LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 3.33 |
| Scott M. StantonMorrison & Foerster | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| Paul F. PereaBaker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.56 |
| David L. EmmonsBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 15 | 1.94 | 1.00 | 2.42 |