MOHEGAN TRIBAL GAMING AUTHORITY
CIK 1005276Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Kevin L. VoldHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- James E. ShowenHogan & HartsonFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Kevin L. VoldHogan & Hartson | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| James E. ShowenHogan & Hartson | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |